This comparison focuses on Keycloak and Authlete's OpenID Connect protocol support. Looking for their (C)IAM features like MFA, SSO, and user management? Compare Keycloak vs Authlete on (C)IAM features.

Keycloak vs Authlete

Compare Keycloak and Authlete side by side across grant types, token endpoint authentication methods, extensions, endpoints, FAPI compliance, and protocol features.

Keycloak🇺🇸

Authlete🇯🇵

Keycloak supports 40 of 44 tracked features, Authlete supports 38.

Feature Comparison

Grant Types

Extensions

Endpoints

Token Endpoint Authentication Methods

none
client_secret_basic
client_secret_post
client_secret_jwt
private_key_jwt
tls_client_auth

Prompts

Features

Financial-grade API (FAPI)

Looking for a different comparison? See the full OpenID Connect Providers benchmark.

Looking for their (C)IAM features like MFA, SSO, and user management? Compare Keycloak vs Authlete on (C)IAM features.

More Keycloak comparisons

Keycloak vs Ping Identity Keycloak vs Curity Keycloak vs Gluu Keycloak vs Okta Keycloak vs Auth0 Keycloak vs Duende IdentityServer Keycloak vs Zitadel Keycloak vs Ory Hydra Keycloak vs Authelia Keycloak vs Microsoft Entra ID Keycloak vs FusionAuth Keycloak vs CyberArk Keycloak vs AWS Cognito Keycloak vs Kinde Keycloak vs WorkOS Keycloak vs Clerk Keycloak vs Frontegg Keycloak vs SailPoint Identity Security Cloud

More Authlete comparisons

Authlete vs Ping Identity Authlete vs Curity Authlete vs Gluu Authlete vs Okta Authlete vs Auth0 Authlete vs Duende IdentityServer Authlete vs Zitadel Authlete vs Ory Hydra Authlete vs Authelia Authlete vs Microsoft Entra ID Authlete vs FusionAuth Authlete vs CyberArk Authlete vs AWS Cognito Authlete vs Kinde Authlete vs WorkOS Authlete vs Clerk Authlete vs Frontegg Authlete vs SailPoint Identity Security Cloud

Note: The current data is based on provider documentation/experience and may not be 100% accurate. Please open an issue if you have spotted any inconsistencies.