This comparison focuses on Keycloak and Zitadel's OpenID Connect protocol support. Looking for their (C)IAM features like MFA, SSO, and user management? Compare Keycloak vs Zitadel on (C)IAM features.
Keycloak vs Zitadel
Compare Keycloak and Zitadel side by side across grant types, token endpoint authentication methods, extensions, endpoints, FAPI compliance, and protocol features.
Feature Comparison
Looking for a different comparison? See the full OpenID Connect Providers benchmark.
Looking for their (C)IAM features like MFA, SSO, and user management? Compare Keycloak vs Zitadel on (C)IAM features.
More Keycloak comparisons
Keycloak vs Ping IdentityKeycloak vs AuthleteKeycloak vs CurityKeycloak vs GluuKeycloak vs OktaKeycloak vs Auth0Keycloak vs Duende IdentityServerKeycloak vs Ory HydraKeycloak vs AutheliaKeycloak vs Microsoft Entra IDKeycloak vs FusionAuthKeycloak vs CyberArkKeycloak vs AWS CognitoKeycloak vs KindeKeycloak vs WorkOSKeycloak vs ClerkKeycloak vs FronteggKeycloak vs SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
More Zitadel comparisons
Zitadel vs Ping IdentityZitadel vs AuthleteZitadel vs CurityZitadel vs GluuZitadel vs OktaZitadel vs Auth0Zitadel vs Duende IdentityServerZitadel vs Ory HydraZitadel vs AutheliaZitadel vs Microsoft Entra IDZitadel vs FusionAuthZitadel vs CyberArkZitadel vs AWS CognitoZitadel vs KindeZitadel vs WorkOSZitadel vs ClerkZitadel vs FronteggZitadel vs SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Note: The current data is based on provider documentation/experience and may not be 100% accurate. Please open an issue if you have spotted any inconsistencies.