This comparison focuses on Zitadel and Microsoft Entra ID's OpenID Connect protocol support. Looking for their (C)IAM features like MFA, SSO, and user management? Compare Zitadel vs Microsoft Entra ID on (C)IAM features.

Zitadel vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compare Zitadel and Microsoft Entra ID side by side across grant types, token endpoint authentication methods, extensions, endpoints, FAPI compliance, and protocol features.

Zitadel🇨🇭

Microsoft Entra ID🇺🇸

Zitadel supports 29 of 44 tracked features, Microsoft Entra ID supports 22.

Feature Comparison

Grant Types

Extensions

Endpoints

Token Endpoint Authentication Methods

none
client_secret_basic
client_secret_post
client_secret_jwt
private_key_jwt
tls_client_auth

Prompts

Features

Financial-grade API (FAPI)

Looking for a different comparison? See the full OpenID Connect Providers benchmark.

Looking for their (C)IAM features like MFA, SSO, and user management? Compare Zitadel vs Microsoft Entra ID on (C)IAM features.

More Zitadel comparisons

Zitadel vs Keycloak Zitadel vs Ping Identity Zitadel vs Authlete Zitadel vs Curity Zitadel vs Gluu Zitadel vs Okta Zitadel vs Auth0 Zitadel vs Duende IdentityServer Zitadel vs Ory Hydra Zitadel vs Authelia Zitadel vs FusionAuth Zitadel vs CyberArk Zitadel vs AWS Cognito Zitadel vs Kinde Zitadel vs WorkOS Zitadel vs Clerk Zitadel vs Frontegg Zitadel vs SailPoint Identity Security Cloud

More Microsoft Entra ID comparisons

Note: The current data is based on provider documentation/experience and may not be 100% accurate. Please open an issue if you have spotted any inconsistencies.